- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:50:01 -0400
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
* McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com> [2005-04-05 17:40+0100] > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-rdf-comments-request@w3.org > > [mailto:www-rdf-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Graham Klyne > > Sent: 05 April 2005 10:36 > > To: Arjohn Kampman; Dave Beckett > > Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Error in RDF/XML Syntax Specification? > > > > > > While I agree with David and Arjohn that ""^^<datatype> > > SHOULD be expressible, I think it's not quite such a > > no-brainer that it should be accepted without Due Process. > > > > In cases like this, what is the W3C process for agreeing > > changes to a published recommendation? > > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html#rec-modify It seems to assume a WG will be around to handle the fixups... Hmm implicitly it doesn't: for this reason, the scope of a Working Group charter generally allows time for work after publication of a Recommendation. I guess we'll do what we can with the resources available. Dan
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:50:02 UTC