- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:31:47 +0000
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Dan, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JanMar/0077.html you raised an issue which was captured in http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-formalism as [[[ There are gotchas in representing the current RDF model in a logical formalism. For example, a statement is defined as triple containing containing at least two, possibly three resources. Resources are not reasonable things to include in a triple. ]]] As recorded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0294.html the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue on the grounds: The WG closes rdfms-logical-formalism on the grounds that the model theory adequately addresses this issue. Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 10:32:02 UTC