- From: Roland Schwaenzl <Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:38:18 +0100 (MET)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Cc: roland@scarlett.mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE
1. CARA has implemented "aboutEach".
2. I don't think rdf:aboutEach requires processing of sub-property relations:
Members of containers must have rdf:_nnn arcs by RDF M&S -
without any inferences required to deduce something like that (see RDF M&S End of sec5).
3. Competing use of explicit numbering (rdf:_1 ...) and rdf:li - as "Refactoring"
seems to allow - is awkward, confusing and yields erronous results:
<rdf:Bag rdf:_1="one">
<rdf:li>one</rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag>
ARP constructs from it 3 triples: Get [genID --rdf:_1--> one] twice. Statements in a model form a set,
which has triples as elements.
The construction currently is not equivalent with
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li>one</rdf:li>
<rdf:li>one</rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag>
which get's correctly processed as [genID --rdf:_1--> one, genID --rdf:_2--> one].
Explicit numbering is of fairly limited use. Is there any format specified for explicit numbering?
ARP excepts rdf:_-1 without any complaint.
4. Which thoughts the wg has about xml:lang ?
It should either be removed from RDF or should create triples -
Cheers
rs
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 17:38:21 UTC