- From: Karsten-A. Otto <ottoka@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:50:18 +0100 (MET)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hello, while reading the updated grammar for RDF, I noticed that production 6.1 (RDF) does not allow the abbreviated form <rdf:RDF/>. I think this should be added as an alternative for the case when no descriptions are present, resulting in <rdf:RDF></rdf:RDF>. XML treats these two forms as equivalent, so it should be allowed for compatibility, and for completeness as all other productions explicitly include the abbreviated form. Regards, Karsten Otto
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 17:54:56 UTC