Updated RDF Grammar

• From: Karsten-A. Otto <ottoka@cs.tu-berlin.de>
• Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:50:18 +0100 (MET)
• To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10111062334460.5671-100000@elf>

Hello,

while reading the updated grammar for RDF, I noticed that production
6.1 (RDF) does not allow the abbreviated form <rdf:RDF/>. I think this
should be added as an alternative for the case when no descriptions
are present, resulting in <rdf:RDF></rdf:RDF>. XML treats these two
forms as equivalent, so it should be allowed for compatibility, and
for completeness as all other productions explicitly include the
abbreviated form.

Regards,

Karsten Otto

Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 17:54:56 UTC