- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:19:58 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Brian McBride wrote: > Jan, > > In > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0211.html > > you raised an issue with the RDF M&S spec which was recorded in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-incomplete > > as > > A graph which contains an anonymous resource which is the object of > two statements cannot be represented in the RDF/XML syntax unless a > URI is assigned to the resource. > > On 26th October 2001, the RDFCore WG decided > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0582.html > > to postpone this issue for consideration by a future WG. > > Please respond, copying www-rdf-comments whether this is an acceptable > decision. It is; ultimately, I'd like to see this resolved. However, it's far from a show-stopper for me, and I'm fully aware of the problems inherent in trying to shoehorn a workaround for this into the current RDF/XML syntax. Cheers- -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk "I like oranges more than apples!?" - that's like comparing apples and oranges!
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 07:21:46 UTC