- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 12:44:14 +0000
- To: GK@NineByNine.org
- CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Graham, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001AprJun/0028.html you raised an issue with the RDF M&S specification which was recorded in http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qnames-as-attrib-values as Currently, resource identifier values specified in attributes such as "about", "resource", "aboutEach" and "type" are specified as URI-references. The same resources used in element or attribute names are specified as Qnames. Other specifications permit the use of Qnames in attribute values. It would enhance readability of RDF were also to do so. On 26th October 2001, the RDFCore WG decided to postpone consideration of this issue until a future WG. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0582.html Could you please respond, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this decision is acceptable. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 07:49:18 UTC