- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:53:09 +0100
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
James Clark: > (The problem here is that rdf:ID is specified as an > NMTOKEN. RELAX NG DTD compatibility provides support for XML 1.0 compatible > IDs, but these have to be NCNames in accordance with the Namespaces Rec.) Dave, are rdf:ID's NCNames or something else, the M&S always matches ids against the idsymbol production which says something about it being an xml name .... Are we trying to keep that restriction or loosen it or haven't we got that far? Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 05:48:33 UTC