Re: New syntax spec

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:55:59 +0100
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-ID: <3B9DFBCF.DD2F48BB@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Rick,

I will forward your question to the WG for comment.

Brian


Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> 
> The draft for the refactored syntax looks much clearer.
> 
> One point that seems a little uncertain to me is whether the
> new productions are supposed to be interpreted
> open or closed.
> 
> For example, take 4.12 propertyAttr: it seems
> that if a typed-node element has an rdf:type attribute, it cannot have
> any attributes from any other namespace.  If it does not have
> an rdf:type then the element can only have one attribute in
> a non-RDF namespace.
> 
> Is that correct?
> 
> Cheers
> Rick Jelliffe

Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2001 07:59:51 UTC