- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:35:52 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Dan, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000JulSep/0018.html you raised an issue concerning an ambiguity in the RDF grammar which was recorded in the RDF issues list. The RDFCore WG has resolved and closed this issue: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity Resolution: On 29th June 2001, the WG decided that containers will match the typed node production in the grammar (M&S Section 6, production 6.13) and that the container specific productions (productions 6.25 to 6.31) and any references to them be removed from the grammar. rdf:li elements will be translated to rdf:_nnn elements when they are found matching either a propertyElt (production 6.12) or a a typedNode (production 6.13). The decision includes a set of test cases. If you have any comments on this resolution, please send them www-rdf-comments@w3.org. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2001 09:39:29 UTC