- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:37:36 -0400
- To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Jonathan Borden wrote: > > I hope the RDFCore WG will consider the forest grammar/tree regular > expression as a specification of the formal RDF XML syntax. The unordered > nature of RDF is best described as a forest grammar and this presents > difficulties for traditional XML schema languages such as DTDs. > snip > > An advantage of specifying the grammar in this language is that it has a > good formal semantics which is based on the formal semantics of XDuce. > http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~hahosoya/xduce/ . Note that the XML Schema > formalism in http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-formal appears to be based on > XDuce as well which is referenced. This is an interesting notation. I'd note that, unfortunately, the example of inference rules in Section 3.8 in http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-formal seems to be in error (the conclusion below the line should also cite g2). This illustrates the important principle that the right formalism doesn't guarantee you'll write the rules properly! -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 15:38:15 UTC