W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: aboutEach: attr val use/mention bug

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:42:50 -0500
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B7432D09.D3FF%aswartz@upclink.com>
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> The simplest answer that meets my needs is: "no,
> it's not an RDF document; there is no rdf:aboutEach
> attribute in RDF; we're sorry for creating any
> impression that there was one.": ;-)

I like this choice a lot, but I'm not sure how we do this within our
"reinterpretation" theme.

How is this a valid interpretation of the spec? Or are we going to claim
"insufficient implementation experience" again?

[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com> ]
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 01:43:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 23 March 2022 17:07:01 UTC