Re: aboutEach: attr val use/mention bug

Dan Connolly <> wrote:

> The simplest answer that meets my needs is: "no,
> it's not an RDF document; there is no rdf:aboutEach
> attribute in RDF; we're sorry for creating any
> impression that there was one.": ;-)

I like this choice a lot, but I'm not sure how we do this within our
"reinterpretation" theme.

How is this a valid interpretation of the spec? Or are we going to claim
"insufficient implementation experience" again?

[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <> ; <> ]

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 01:43:02 UTC