Hi Art, > If you mean Namespaces in XML, then I agree. Yes, that's what I meant. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#ex-Sharing > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#ex-NonBinary > > use: > > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > > and seem to assume that the default namespace applies to the > RDF-specific attributes. We've got that one as: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion My question is whether we think there is a more general problem with other namespaces. I think we've got this one covered. BrianReceived on Monday, 16 April 2001 11:01:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 23 March 2022 17:07:01 UTC