Hi Aaron, This has been added to this issues list as: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-boolean-valued-properties Brian Aaron Swartz wrote: > > The spec explains how to deal with relationships > 3 (rdf:value) but not > those < 3 (i.e. two). I'd like to suggest we introduce two new properties: > > rdf:is > rdf:isNot > > This saves us from having to do something klugey like: > > <http://www.aaronsw.com/> bob:likesChocolate 0 . > > and also allows RDF processors to know that it's part of two-valued logic > and treat it properly. > > -- > Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| The Info Network > <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://theinfo.org> > AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to beReceived on Sunday, 15 April 2001 17:54:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 23 March 2022 17:07:01 UTC