- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:24:59 -0500
- To: Ryo Asai <asai@sec.co.jp>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:54:35AM +0900, Ryo Asai wrote: > > Does anyone tell me SiRPAC’s implementation is right or not. FYI - this issue was raised a while ago by someone from the CC/PP WG: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000AprJun/0013.html and given the response from Ralph Swick (co-editor of the M&S spec): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000AprJun/0014.html my take is that SiRPAC is following the "expectation of the Working Group". Note, however, that Ralph states: In fact, the RDF Model and Syntax specification does not tell you how to construct a full URI for the resource named by an ID or bagID. The resources are addressable at best only locally within the same RDF/XML expression. Given that the construction of a full URI is not specified, it seems like SiRPAC [and any other system that constructs such a URI] should be "right" or "not wrong" :-). Art ---
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 08:25:08 UTC