- From: Marshall Price <d021317c@dc.seflin.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
"Many times" is a poor substitute for "often," and one which always rubs me the wrong way. Not only does it fail to express the basic concept of frequency ("times" with respect to "time"), but it leaves the reader wondering what number "many" represents, and how it compares to other numbers considered "many." When I first encountered this abomination in the early 1970's, I expected it to disappear in a cloud of ridicule, and until now, I thought it had. Evidently, a bit more nose-thumbing is in order -- it has yet to be scorned many enough times. The disaster in question occurs at "Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification" URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/ -- Marshall Price of Miami, Florida I'm voting for John Hagelin d021317c@dc.seflin.org : "Oh, to unfree one's heaven!"
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2000 08:13:16 UTC