- From: Hidetaka Ohto <ohto@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:40:53 -0400
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Ralph:
Thank you for answering my questions while reading
between my poor English lines at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000AprJun/0014.html
Your answers are very helpful to me.
> By way of preface, after writing most of this reply to you I went
> back and scanned some of Tim Berners-Lee's musings on this subject:
> -> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Identity.html "Identifiers - what
> is identified?". I think that Tim and I may have reached slightly
> different conclusions about some of the details. I might post a
> followup to this.
I glanced the document, and it seems to be very relevant
and I am defintely going to read it, while expecting
that you post a followup to the document.
Meanwhile I am a bit confused about some of your answers.
So may I ask you a further question?
As far as I understood (which may be wrong), you said that
RDF Schema CR thinks that "rdf:ID" is a kind of syntax
abbreviation of "rdf:about". (you also said that there is a
philosophical or semantical? difference between them in
RDF M&S though.)
If it is true, it seems to me that there is a way of refering to
a RDF resource which is created by a RDF description
by another RDF description which is in another document.
(as long as I could ignore the mime type issues for dereferencing
fragment id and I could apply rdf specific rules for resolving this.)
For example:
a) http://aaa/aaa.rdf
(assuming the base URI for the description below is "http://aaa/aaa.rdf#" )
-------------------------
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns="http://xxx/xxx#">
<rdf:Description ID="a">
<p1>v1</p1>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
b) http://bbb/bbb.rdf
-------------------------
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns="http://xxx/xxx#">
<rdf:Description about="http://aaa/aaa.rdf#a">
<p2>v2</p2>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Because a) could be considered as same as follows:
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns="http://xxx/xxx#">
<rdf:Description about="http://aaa/aaa.rdf#a">
<p1>v1</p1>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
However, you also said "the RDF Model and Syntax
spec does not tell you how to construct a full URI for the
resource named by an ID or bagID."
So I am a bit confused.
My interpretation is that the RDF Schema spec is going to
supplement the RDF M&S spec concerning the URI construct
like above.
Is this what you meant?
Or am I missing something?
The followings are my comments on your answer:
It might be a tough situation where we need to refer a
created RDF resource whose description is embedded in an XML
document using namespace. However it would seem a likely case.
I hope that the solution will be provided in the near future.
Best Regards,
-- Taka
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2000 22:38:10 UTC