- From: Hidetaka Ohto <ohto@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:40:53 -0400
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Ralph: Thank you for answering my questions while reading between my poor English lines at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000AprJun/0014.html Your answers are very helpful to me. > By way of preface, after writing most of this reply to you I went > back and scanned some of Tim Berners-Lee's musings on this subject: > -> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Identity.html "Identifiers - what > is identified?". I think that Tim and I may have reached slightly > different conclusions about some of the details. I might post a > followup to this. I glanced the document, and it seems to be very relevant and I am defintely going to read it, while expecting that you post a followup to the document. Meanwhile I am a bit confused about some of your answers. So may I ask you a further question? As far as I understood (which may be wrong), you said that RDF Schema CR thinks that "rdf:ID" is a kind of syntax abbreviation of "rdf:about". (you also said that there is a philosophical or semantical? difference between them in RDF M&S though.) If it is true, it seems to me that there is a way of refering to a RDF resource which is created by a RDF description by another RDF description which is in another document. (as long as I could ignore the mime type issues for dereferencing fragment id and I could apply rdf specific rules for resolving this.) For example: a) http://aaa/aaa.rdf (assuming the base URI for the description below is "http://aaa/aaa.rdf#" ) ------------------------- <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://xxx/xxx#"> <rdf:Description ID="a"> <p1>v1</p1> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> b) http://bbb/bbb.rdf ------------------------- <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://xxx/xxx#"> <rdf:Description about="http://aaa/aaa.rdf#a"> <p2>v2</p2> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> Because a) could be considered as same as follows: <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://xxx/xxx#"> <rdf:Description about="http://aaa/aaa.rdf#a"> <p1>v1</p1> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> However, you also said "the RDF Model and Syntax spec does not tell you how to construct a full URI for the resource named by an ID or bagID." So I am a bit confused. My interpretation is that the RDF Schema spec is going to supplement the RDF M&S spec concerning the URI construct like above. Is this what you meant? Or am I missing something? The followings are my comments on your answer: It might be a tough situation where we need to refer a created RDF resource whose description is embedded in an XML document using namespace. However it would seem a likely case. I hope that the solution will be provided in the near future. Best Regards, -- Taka
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2000 22:38:10 UTC