Re: Concerning iCal in RDF

Renato,

> I think the best option is the small-dedicated group producing a W3C
> Submission. It then gives it visibility and (some) credibility.

Agree.

> It would make a great companion to vCard RDF - and something the SWXG can use
> as an outcome....
> 
> Let me know how I can help ;-)

Great, thanks a million! I guess we can do it in the same way as you did
with vCard. I expect only minor editorial things (mainly: defining the
namespace URI) while keeping essentially DanC's original W3C Note [1] and
maybe adding the TC, as suggested.

How shall we proceed? Initial skype call, see who is up to it? Would you
lead this?

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfcal/

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:08:15 +1000
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: <director@dcc.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak
> <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Dan Connolly
> <connolly@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
> Subject: Re: Concerning iCal in RDF
> 
> 
> I think the best option is the small-dedicated group producing a W3C
> Submission.
> It then gives it visibility and (some) credibility.
> 
> It would make a great companion to vCard RDF - and something the SWXG can use
> as an outcome....
> 
> Let me know how I can help ;-)
> 
> Cheers...  Renato Iannella
> NICTA
>

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 13:31:09 UTC