- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:40:58 +0000
- To: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Cc: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org, Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
KANZAKI Masahide wrote: > Oops, sorry, I thought the opposite: > > (i.e. I misunderstood that you proposed to use ...2002/12/cal#, > instead of ...2002/12/cal/icaltzd#). > > As Danbri mentioned, I've used another original URI > (...2002/12/cal/ical#) for a long (!) time, and recently moved to > ...2002/12/cal/icaltzd#, so upset by one more change... > > Some problems may still remain, but in my case, it is welcome to make > the namespace URI clear and stable. Ah, I'm glad this was a misunderstanding :) After this migration, do you have any new insights into the tradeoffs between the two designs? If you're aware of problems, it seems that we still could address them since none of this has massive adoption yet. cheers, Dan -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 12:41:35 UTC