- From: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:40:05 -0300
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > Because any changes to the http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal namespace, > which you use in your document, have to follow that process. > > If you mean to follow that process, very well. Otherwise, best > to pick a new namespace name. > Without a doubt! The W3 namespace was used in this document as a placeholder and a discussion starter, indicating the desire that the different efforts converge. In fact, this document isn't even a specification---it's sort of a systematic process for creating a specification---a guide, if you will---although statements for a specification naturally fall out of such a process. > >> By the way, where is this iCalendar schema that I keep seeing mention of? >> > > Umm... follow your nose... http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal > Hmmm... There's http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical.rdf and http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/icaltzd.rdf , but I couldn't find any definitive description of the syntax for a UTF-OFFSET, the content of a #Value_RECUR, a description of #List_of_Float, etc. I realize I'm coming to this discussion late. I'll go over these schemas more closely. Garret
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 19:41:18 UTC