Re: is this good? what is the last RDF/S? any other connectors?

On 19.03.2005 08:19:21, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
>> * the anos bug me on querying, are they really needed?
>
>No, not in the timezones-as-datatypes design.
oh, is that design documented somewhere?

I also just read
>my 25 Feb message
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2005Feb/0016.html

which talks about a namespace change. Is that related to the
changed design?

Some time ago I was looking for terms to describe
semweb events (conferences, workshops, etc), and
libby suggested to (at least partly) use the
RDFiCal vocabulary. My current design follows
the stuff in the wiki and other examples I found:
[[
<conf:Conference>
   <rdf:type rdf:resource="&ical;Vevent"/>
   <ical:summary>ISWC 2005</ical:summary>
   <ical:dtstart>
      <aux:DateTime>
         <ical:date>2005-11-06</ical:date>
      </aux:DateTime>
   </ical:dtstart>
   <ical:dtend>
      <aux:DateTime>
         <ical:date>2005-11-11</ical:date>
      </aux:DateTime>
   </ical:dtend>
</conf:Conference>
]]
(the aux:DateTime is a class I made up to group
some date/time-related props in order to better guide
the user through the editing steps.)

I just realized that neither ical:date nor ical:dateTime
are in the spec at [1]. ical:dtstart/dtend is still
described as an owl:ObjectProperty, though. The range
points to undescribed classes such as ical:Value_DATE
or ical:Value_DATE-TIME.

Any suggestions?

thanx in advance,
benjamin

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#


>
>-- 
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>

Received on Saturday, 19 March 2005 16:25:38 UTC