- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:40:57 -0500
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 18:21 +0100, Libby Miller wrote: > Dan, > > Am I right in thinking > > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/icaltzd.rdf > > is the version of RDF calendar you've been working on most recently and > > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical.rdf > > is the older one? yes. > Are you happy with them new one? Well, no, not really. > Are the tests in http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/test/ generated from the > newer one? I forget. :( > I'm asking because a couple of people have asked me about RDF calendar > recently and I'm so out of touch I didn't know what to tell them :-/ I'm starting to forget too, evidently. > The microformats stuff is very cool btw. > > thanks, > > Libby -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 17:41:04 UTC