Re: toIcal.xsl -- progress on syntactic profile

Somehow when I pulled up your site, the #13;#10; were missing in what I 
viewed; maybe a function of the browser, who knows?
I hadn't read 4.3.11 that closely, so I missed all of the quoting stuff... 
now I understand the reason for your code. Mind if I lift it, with attribution?




At 08:49 PM 11/12/04, you wrote:


>Version skew? The run above was using:
>
>$ ident toIcal.xsl
>toIcal.xsl:
>      $Id: toIcal.xsl,v 1.4 2004/11/10 06:50:28 connolly Exp $
>
>>  I'm not sure I follow the code which calls the 'replace-string' 
>> template - can you explain it a little bit more?
>
>Did you see the reference to rfc2445#sec4.3.11 in the comment?
>
>It implements writing newlines as "\n" per
>http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445#sec4.3.11
>
>--
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>
>

Tim Hare
Interested Bystander, Non-Inc. 

Received on Saturday, 13 November 2004 22:20:30 UTC