W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > September 2003

agenda/proposals for RDF calendar meet 2003-09-03

From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:07:30 +0100 (BST)
To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0309021715020.19114-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

There are several proposals and suggestions below, on winding up the
IRC chats, documentation, IDs for events, timezones and
interpretation properties, and xproperties. Please feel free to comment
on those or anything below (preferably in a new thread), even if you
can't make it to the meeting tomorrow.

The next meet is this Wednesday, 2003-09-03, 1600UTC (tomorrow)


We meet on IRC, irc.freenode.net #rdfig for 90 minutes.
More on IRC: http://esw.w3.org/topic/InternetRelayChat

Last meeting's weblog, serving as the meeting record:

Logs of the last meeting:

some agenda items

* roundtripping
ACTION mortenf: take a stab at regression tests for .ics->.rdf and/or

* winding down the calendar chats?
Recently there has been a reduction in enthusiasm about the RDF
calendar chats.

PROPOSED: that we move the discussions to email for now; the IRC chats
can be resurrected if there is sufficient interest in the future.

* documentation
I would like to see a W3C Note or something similar come out of this
work - what does everyone think?

* xproperties and their usefulness or otherwise:

Issue: roundtripping is not possible with xproperties

possible solution: remove from tests.
are there any we think are useful to support?

16:27:12 <mortenf> seems there are 6 diff:
16:27:40 <mortenf> in all .ics files

* Other outstanding actions and items

- http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/05/14/2003-05-14.html#1052921345.552964
InterpretationProperties, esp as applied to timezones
-- we discussed this last week, but didn't resolve anything. I'd like to
have a vote on what's best to do in this case.

PROPOSED: that we note the issue but keep the status quo.

The discussion starts about here:

<DanC> here's where I am: (a) I'm uncomfortable with the way our RDF
timezone properties work, and I suspect applying the
InterpretationProperties pattern would help, but (b) I'm able to get
work done with the status quo, and (c) I haven't found sufficient
motivation to design and implement something better

17:24:09 <libby> given limited effort available to do this work, I
wonder if the status quo might be the best thing to do
17:26:29 <libby> it seems to me that if we can work with it, it might be
better declaring the vocab 'finished' and moving on to more interesting
things, rather than starting another big job

- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Aug/0001.html
IDs for events?

last discussion:

I'd be happier if we could get a resolution for this.

PROPOSED: that we leave as is, that is, support UIDs as iCalendar RFC
2445 does, but not specify anything about whether or how one event is
deemed to be the same event as another.

- http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/05/14/2003-05-14.html#1052921472.659227
ACTION libby look at skical optimeset and report back

- http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/06/25/2003-06-25.html#1056556072.203619
ACTION libby: add a couple schemas under cal/prod

More agenda items very welcome.


Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:01:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:48 UTC