- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 13 Mar 2003 23:19:29 -0600
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Hi Libby,
Working on going back from RDF to .ics,
I finally get it. dtstamp should be
treated like dtstart and dtend, ala...
cal01.rdf
@@ -86,7 +90,9 @@
<component>
<Vevent>
<uid>20020630T230600Z-3895-69-1-16@jammer</uid>
- <dtstamp>2002-06-30T23:06:00Z</dtstamp>
+ <dtstamp rdf:parseType='Resource'>
+ <dateTime>2002-06-30T23:06:00Z</dateTime>
+ </dtstamp>
<dtstart rdf:parseType='Resource'>
<dateTime>2002-07-18T09:00:00</dateTime>
I've updated the schema to not say that
dtstamp ss:rangeIntersects rdfs:Literal.
http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical
revision 1.5
date: 2003/03/14 05:16:21; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3
dtstamp handling
FYI, this reverses:
RESOLVED: all is well. nothing needs changing. datestamp in this test
case is ok.
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046275343.439413
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 00:18:21 UTC