- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:03:47 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0302141243370.13711-200000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
hi all, The next RDF interest group calendar IRC meeting is 26th Feb 2003, at 17:00 UTC (two weeks' time): http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=26&month=2&year=2003&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 Agenda items to me please. Our meeting on wednesday 12th Feb resulted in some decisions: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-02-12.html#T17-33-35 RESOLVED(1.1q4): to use { ical:component a rdf:Property; ss:rangeIntersects ical:Vevent } to relate calendars to events, e.g. in the case of multiple calendars in one file. { :cal1 ical:component :ev1. :cal2 ical:component :ev2 }. http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-02-12.html#T17-45-41 RESOLVED(1.2q.drop): whereas relationship beteween files and ical:Calendars is not 1-1, drop Vcalendar rdf:about="" from our icalendar<->RDF mapping. see http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ for agenda, logs, weblog. We also had an interesting discussion about recurrence, from Graham Klyne's suggestion, which resulted in a proposal: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-02-12.html#T18-17-33 <gk> PROPOSED(2q1): to represent RRULE as ical2rdf.pl,v 1.6 2003/01/22 21:17:12 does, using rrule, freq, byday, and also with interval always specified. If ics interval is omitted, translation must add interval="1" <DanCon> narrow the proposal to just the RRULE in http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/Calendaring/iCalendarExample.txt , I suggest This was not resolved but the discussion tended towards agreeing that this was needed. I've updated the java ical2rdf with respect to the resolutions (although not the final proposal yet). http://ilrt.org/discovery/2003/02/cal/ http://ilrt.org/discovery/2003/02/cal/mimedir-parser/readme.libby cheesr Libby
Attachments
- TEXT/PLAIN attachment: 20030226mtg.ics
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 08:06:46 UTC