- From: Feng Pan <pan@ISI.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:52:01 -0700
- To: <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jerry Hobbs" <hobbs@ISI.EDU>
- Message-ID: <014f01c35c75$bb37ef40$6700a8c0@Feng>
Hi, we have developed an "entry" sub-ontology of time, expressed in OWL, that is much simpler than the full DAML-Time ontology (http://www.cs.rochester.edu/~ferguson/daml/) and provides all of what most users would need, i.e., a vocabulary for expressing facts about topological relations among instants, intervals, and events, together with information about durations and about dates and times. Its documentation, including a use case, could be found at http://www.isi.edu/~pan/damltime/time-entry-documentation.txt, and the ontology in OWL at http://www.isi.edu/~pan/damltime/time-entry.owl Please let me know if you have any comments on this work. Thanks, Feng Pan ----- Original Message ----- > Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:43:59 -0400 > From: Paul Buhler <pbuhler@cs.cofc.edu> > To: 'Feng Pan' <pan@ISI.EDU> > Subject: Time ontology... > > Hi Feng, > > I saw the emails posted by David Martin on the www-ws-request mailing > list. You might want to post to the www-rdf-calendar-request@w3.org > mailing list to see if they would be interested in your work. They > have > mostly been active developing a representation of RFC2445 (iCal) in > RDF. > Dealing with time representations have/continue to be (IMO) an issue. > > Regards, > > Paul Buhler > College of Charleston > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 19:52:27 UTC