Re: moving stuff back to the calendar workspace

fair enough, we resolved it as you say:

[[
18:19:22  <DanC> I'm considering moving the meeting index into wiki
space to facilitate wishes like that being granted by other folks.
18:19:40  <danbri_> 2nd'd
18:20:13  <libby> go for it. it's a pain updating it...
18:20:34  <DanC> I:RESOLVED: to use the wiki for meeting index. ACTION
DanC
]]

Libby


On 16 Apr 2003, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 05:24, Libby Miller wrote:
> > Dan, I notice that the links to the recent calendar meeting records have
> > been moved to the wiki.
>
> yes, per our decision of 26Mar
>
>   "RESOLVED: to use the wiki for meeting index. ACTION DanC"
>   --
> http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/03/26/2003-03-26.html#1048697881.388674
>
> >  I think we should move them back (I'll do it) -
> > maybe just link to the summaries I've been sending to www-rdf-calendar
> > to save space.
> >
> > The reason I want to do this is because we said
> >
> > [[
> > If the last modified dates below are more than a few months old, active
> > developments have likely ceased. If things ever actually stabilize,
> > we'll change this status message.
> > ]]
> >
> > I know this could mean anything on the page, but the meetings are an
> > active reason to change the page. Plus I think people will find it
> > annoying to have to look in two places for meeting information.
>
> The wiki page is only one place.
>
> > I'll take responsibility for making sure the workspace is updated within
> > a week of any given meeting.
>
> Is that really a good use of your time?
>
> > How's that sound? Have I missed your reason for putting them on the
> > wiki?
>
> Just that I don't see any good reason why you and I should be the
> only ones to edit the meeting index.
>
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Libby
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 10:00:21 UTC