- From: Bill Kearney <wkearney99@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:31:40 -0400
- To: "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: "Gary McGath" <callist@mcgath.com>, "www-rdf-calendar" <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
You can also do it via javascript. I have a hash-maker at: http://feeds.archive.org/misc/hash ----- Original Message ----- From: "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk> To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org> Cc: "Gary McGath" <callist@mcgath.com>; "www-rdf-calendar" <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 9:23 AM Subject: Re: Attendees in public documents > > > my foaf harvester turns every email address into a hash and uses > these for matches. There are plenty of online converters and code for > doing this, e.g. > > Morten Frederiksen's online converter > http://xml.mfd-consult.dk/foaf/sha1ify/ > > in the context of foaf, an online converter by Leigh Dodds: > http://www.ldodds.com/foaf/foaf-a-matic.html > > I found some snippets of code that also do this: > > Java > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/200303/geo/JavaSha1.java > > Perl > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/200303/geo/PerlSha1.pl > > These all hash the mailto: part as well as the actual mail address. > > Libby > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > > > > FOAF systems are now using a one-way hash of the mailbox - one of the > > benefits of RDF is that we should be able to copy it pretty easily. > > > > Are there any FOAF systems that understand the equivalence between a hash of > > the box and the thing itself - i.e. know how to run a hash over a foaf:mbox > > so it can be compared to a foaf:sha1 ? I don't know. > > > > cheers > > > > Chaals > > > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Gary McGath wrote: > > > > > > > >The iCalendar standard recommends representing an attendee with an email > > >address. For public documents, this isn't always desirable, for reasons > > >everyone knows. So far in TimeCzar I've been just filling this in as > > >"x@x.invalid", and putting the attendee's actual name in the "CN" > > >property. Is this the best thing to do, or are there other alternatives > > >that would be more appropriate? > > > > > >BTW, I'm working on a feature for the next TimeCzar beta which will > > >allow the site maintainer to expose the entire data file as an iCalendar > > >document. I'm hoping this will be useful for people who want to make > > >calendar data available to Web client applications. (Sorry, I still > > >haven't touched CAP support.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com/consulting/ > > >callist@mcgath.com accepts ONLY mail sent to specified mailing lists. > > >For other purposes, please send mail to gmcgath at the same domain. > > > > > > > -- > > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 > > SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 > > Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or > > W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 09:31:51 UTC