- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 23 Jul 2002 17:05:50 -0500
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Picking up from earlier discussion here in rdf-calendar... "Dan Connolly has said to me that the iCalendar RDF schema is useful to him because it directly mapps to iCalendar itself, and that conversion between formats is just fine as far as he is concerned." -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2002May/0000.html That's pretty close to what I meant, but what I really meant was: an iCalendar RDF schema is useful *inasmuch* as it directly maps to iCalendar itself. I took this approach rather literally in the last few months: I wrote the smallest (in time-to-develop) program that would extract ical info from an RDF KB and spit it out in ical format -- at least: in a format that evolution, my ical tool, groks. I reported on this back in January... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2002Jan/0002.html More recently, I started going the other way: taking my evoluiton .ics file and trying to convert it to RDF, with the minimum-time-to-develop perl hack. For some reason, I started in http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2001/palmagent/ on vcal2xml.pl . But after it started working, I decided I would integrated it more with the other SWAP PIM tools, so I put it at http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/ical2rdf.pl While I was cleaning up and moving into swap/pim, I decided to take a sort of scruffy approach to building a schema: take some test data http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/pim/testCal.ics http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/pim/testTasks.ics convert it to RDF http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/pim/testCal.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/pim/testTasks.rdf and build a schema from whatever properties are used there: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/ical http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/ical.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/ical.n3 Here are the rules for sniffing a schema from some data: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/sniffSchema.n3 and the makefile that details how I did it: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/Makefile To close the loop, I just updated my toIcal.py tool to this swap/pim/ical namespace (the Jan 2002 version used the hybrid schema): http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/toIcal.py it still only supports a handful of properties, but it's enough to get flight info into my calendar. Well... actually, I haven't tested this updated code on that application. I ought to close the loop: see what, if any, differences there are between my completely syntax drive/bottom-up ical schema and the hand-written ical schema. http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/06/schemas/ical-full/hybrid.rdf Meanwhile, I gather Libby isn't using the hybrid schema actively any more, so I'm not sure that's high on my priority list. The main goal of these tools (toIcal.py and ical2rdf.pl) is interchange (import/export) with ical tools like evolution. I hope to get clean round-tripping of my test .ics files eventually. Does anybody have .ics files generated by some other tool? I could add that to my test data. Also, if you find that the .ics generated by toIcal.py isn't accepted by some ical tool, please let me know. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 18:05:38 UTC