- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 21 Dec 2002 12:36:51 -0600
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 23:28, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On 20 Dec 2002, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > >Following from our discussion today about the new workspace > > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ > [snip] [...] > The Gregorian calendar was adopted at different times in > different places. OK, yes, the gregorian calendar sucks. But as they say, it sucks less than everything else. That is: there's an IETF RFC and a bunch of running code that groks the gregorian calendar. The understanding shared by the iCalendar spec readers/writers/implementors/users is what I think we're modelling in http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical That schema is grounded in real data coming from real tools, plus a little bit of checking that it conforms to the spec. Hmm... time for a dc:description, I suppose. I'm sorta interested in other calendars, but that's another subject; i.e. I'll change the subject line before going into that stuff... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Saturday, 21 December 2002 13:36:57 UTC