- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:36:38 -0500
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Alan Davies <aland@steltor.com>, Michael Arick <marick@cse.ucsc.edu>, RDF Calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
On Friday, June 22, 2001, at 01:03 PM, Libby Miller wrote:
> However, this problem could I think be resolved if in RDF literals were
> allowed to be the subjects of RDf statements, because then we could
> subclass a literal for date-time, and preserve the simplicity
> while keeping the structure. Aaron - does that sound right?
I'm not certain that would help -- it really depends more on the
route we chose to add this feature. This does seem like a
somewhat tricky issue you're facing. The best way I can think
of is something like:
<dtstart><DateTime rdf:value="W3CDTF goes here" /></dtstart>
What do you think?
--
"Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Monday, 25 June 2001 21:36:45 UTC