W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > August 2001

Re: relationship to iCalendar

From: Martijn van Beers <martijn@eekeek.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:11:50 +0200
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010813211150.B9139@khazad-dum.copa.nl>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Libby Miller wrote:
> > Hrm. what's wrong with sticking close to iCalendar?
> We fully intend that documents written in rdf-cal format (or whatever we
> decide to call it) will be mappable to iCalendar format and
> vice-versa. 
ok, good :)

> Also the capitalisation of names in iCalendar will probably
> change in rdf-cal because the convention in RDF is to give classes a
> first capital letter and have properties in lower case. These again are
> all fairly trivial.
Note that the last paragraph of section 4.1 reads:

   All names of properties, property parameters, enumerated property
   values and property parameter values are case-insensitive. However,
   all other property values are case-sensitive, unless otherwise

> More fundamental is the difficulty that iCalendar may not give us all
> that we may want from descriptions of events.
Hopefully you will be working with the CALSCH WG to solve this on both

Received on Monday, 13 August 2001 15:09:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:46 UTC