- From: Martijn van Beers <martijn@eekeek.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 20:27:22 +0200
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:10:09AM +0100, Libby Miller wrote: > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/06/schemas/ical-full/hybrid.rdf > > 3. How closely does this specification model the iCalendar structure? > currently, very closely, although as we get more implementation > experience, this may change. Hrm. what's wrong with sticking close to iCalendar? I'm working on Net::ICal, a perl implementation of rfc2445, and I was thinking of making it capable of outputting rdf as specified by your schema, so we can use xsl to convert it to html/other xml formats. But if you're going to move away from iCalendar, I'd have to come up with my own xml format. Another question, why are <ical:VEVENT>s wrapped in a <ical::VEVENT-PROP>? From the example data you have (http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/06/content/swws2001-07-30.rdf) it looks like it's just a gratuitous extra tag. Martijn
Received on Friday, 10 August 2001 14:25:38 UTC