- From: Otis Gospodnetic <otisg@panther.middlebury.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-rdb@w3.org
add Sybase's web.sql (I think) to that list. Otis > > Microsoft has some good products to tie FoxPro, Access, or SQL Server to > the web. I've never used them, but I hear they're okay. > > Claris has something to tie FileMaker Pro to the web. I haven't used it > but I'm converting an existing FMP database to standard cgi, going from > Mac to UNIX, and what I see is that they store alot of stuff directly in > the db (embedded html, for instance). There seems to be some problems > with update access, but read-only works pretty well. Looks kind of > storage-hoggish if you ask me, but what do I know? The point is I hear > tell that the development cycle for the web pages is nice and short and > the gateway is reliable. I have no reason to doubt. > > Informix is real web friendly. Version 7 has both ESQL/C and CLI/ODBC > access, but the html are your problem. I'm using the ODBC option with C > language CGI right now and I'm real happy with it. Some folks upstairs > are using an ESQL/C interface and they seem to be pleased too. I hear > tell there's a new product out for Informix that is more like what you > want (actual development tools for the web); but that's only hearsay. > > > Bruce Alexander <balexand@cac.washington.edu> > UW Computing & Communications > Student Information Systems > (206) 685-6293 > > - All views and opinions expressed are my own - > > > On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, John D Groenveld wrote: > > > What would you like to talk about? I have a question. Besides Oracle, which > > RDBMS vendors ship with Web gateway products (4GL's, Web enabled dev tools)? > > I'm not interested in 3rd party tools. > > Thanks, > > John > > groenvel@cse.psu.edu > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 1996 19:50:13 UTC