> Section 3.12.5 Constructor Functions seems to be pretty clear > about it: That only says they are equivalent to casts. Are casts exempt from the general rule of substitutability, which says that any expression can return a value whose dynamic type is a subtype of the required type? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/Received on Friday, 24 February 2006 16:58:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:44 UTC