Re: Recursive replacement

> (I'm sorry for my tiresomeness):
You seem to be asking good questions!

> 1) result:
yes I think so

> 2) result: implementation-dependent
I think I'll leave that for the WG again:-) I guess so, or at least
"currently under specified"

I should stress again perhaps that I'm not on the WG, so my answers
are only my reading of the spec (and I haven't read it all, just jumped
about it a bit)

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 17:14:08 UTC