W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Recursive replacement

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:03:51 GMT
Message-Id: <200601301703.RAA23721@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: novak@ispras.ru
CC: www-ql@w3.org

> (I'm sorry for my tiresomeness):
You seem to be asking good questions!

> 1) result:
yes I think so

> 2) result: implementation-dependent
I think I'll leave that for the WG again:-) I guess so, or at least
"currently under specified"

I should stress again perhaps that I'm not on the WG, so my answers
are only my reading of the spec (and I haven't read it all, just jumped
about it a bit)


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 17:14:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:44 UTC