- From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:56:40 -0800 (PST)
- To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, www-ql@w3.org
Thank you Mike..
Regards,
Mukul
--- Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk> wrote:
> I'm hoping to do some XSLT vs XQuery performance
> comparisons over a wider
> range of queries over the next few weeks. I don't
> think you can draw too
> many conclusions from one example. However, I think
> that queries of the kind
> "copy the whole tree except for X" are more natural
> to express in XSLT than
> in XQuery and it wouldn't be surprising if such
> queries also performed
> better in XSLT. There are other queries (the more
> SQL-like queries) that are
> more natural to express in XQuery.
>
> Obviously you can't extrapolate any performance
> results from Saxon and
> assume that they are characteristic of the two
> languages. That requires a
> wider set of comparisons.
>
> I suspect most people will choose between the two
> languages based on
> perceived usability rather than performance.
> Perceived usability depends
> largely (in my view) on what other languages you
> have used before.
>
> Michael Kay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ql-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-ql-request@w3.org] On
> > Behalf Of Mukul Gandhi
> > Sent: 21 March 2005 08:06
> > To: Michael Kay; www-ql@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: how to prune subtrees in an XQuery
> result
> >
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> > I did a performance comparison between XQuery
> > solution and the XSLT (1.0) solution (using Saxon
> 8.3;
> > with -t option).
> >
> > The equivalent XSLT solution is(I guess it can be
> > written more efficiently):
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> > <xsl:stylesheet
> > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
> > version="1.0">
> >
> > <xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes" />
> >
> > <xsl:template match="/ASet">
> > <Results>
> > <xsl:for-each select="A">
> > <xsl:if test="B[(. = 'red') or (. =
> 'yellow')]
> > or C[(. = 'chair') or (. = 'table')]">
> > <A>
> > <xsl:copy-of select="@*" />
> > <xsl:copy-of select="B[(. = 'red') or
> (. =
> > 'yellow')] | C[(. = 'chair') or (. = 'table')]" />
> > </A>
> > </xsl:if>
> > </xsl:for-each>
> > </Results>
> > </xsl:template>
> >
> > </xsl:stylesheet>
> >
> > XQuery solution's (average) execution time is -
> 313
> > milliseconds
> > XSLT solution's (average) execution time is - 63
> > milliseconds
> >
> > XSLT seems quite faster than XQuery. Can we
> conclude
> > that XSLT will always be faster than XQuery?
> >
> > I believe XQuery is geared more towards database
> > rather than flat XML files.. Should we still
> prefer
> > XQuery sometimes than XSLT (when doing a normal
> flat
> > file XML transformation).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mukul
> >
> > --- Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk> wrote:
> > > Here's a solution that doesn't involve doing the
> > > comparisons twice.
> > >
> > > <Results> {
> > > for $A in doc("data.xml")/ASet/A
> > > let $matches := $A/(B[.=("red","yellow")]
> > > |C[.=("chair","table")])
> > > where ($matches)
> > > return <A>{$matches}</A>
> > > }</Results>
> > >
> > > Michael Kay
> > > http://www.saxonica.com/
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Sergio,
> > > > Probably this XQuery is required..
> > > >
> > > > <Results>
> > > > {
> > > > for $A in doc("data.xml")/ASet/A
> > > > where ($A/B = "red" or $A/B = "yellow")
> > > > and ($A/C = "chair" or $A/C =
> "table")
> > >
> > > >
> > > > return
> > > > <A>
> > > > {$A/@*}
> > > > {$A/B[(. = 'red') or (. = 'yellow')]}
> > > > {$A/C[(. = 'chair') or (. = 'table')]}
> > > > </A>
> > > > }
> > > > </Results>
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mukul
> > > >
> > > > --- Sergio Andreozzi
> > > <sergio.andreozzi@cnaf.infn.it>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm wondering what is the best way to prune
> > > subtrees
> > > > > that did not match
> > > > > the where clause of a FLOWER expression.
> See
> > > the
> > > > > example below for
> > > > > clarification:
> > > > >
> > > > > SAMPLE DATA
> > > > >
> > > > > <ASet>
> > > > > <A name="one">
> > > > > <B>red</B>
> > > > > <B>yellow</B>
> > > > > <B>green</B>
> > > > > <C>chair</C>
> > > > > <C>table</C>
> > > > > <C>sofa</C>
> > > > > </A>
> > > > > <A name="two">
> > > > > <B>red</B>
> > > > > <B>green</B>
> > > > > <C>chair</C>
> > > > > <C>sofa</C>
> > > > > </A>
> > > > > <A name="three">
> > > > > <B>green</B>
> > > > > <C>chair</C>
> > > > > <C>table</C>
> > > > > <C>sofa</C>
> > > > > </A>
> > > > > </ASet>
> > > > >
> > > > > QUERY: for each A, list all the name of A,
> their
> > > B
> > > > > elements that are
> > > > > either "red" or "yellow" and their C
> elements
> > > that
> > > > > are either "chair" or
> > > > > "table"
> > > > >
> > > > > EXPECTED RESULT:
> > > > >
> > > > > <Results>
> > > > > <A name="one">
> > > > > <B>red</B>
> > > > > <B>yellow</B>
> > > > > <C>chair</C>
> > > > > <C>table</C>
> > > > > </A>
> > > > > <A name="two">
> > > > > <B>red</B>
> > > > > <C>chair</C>
> > > > > </A>
> > > > > </Results>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > in practice what I would like to understand
> is
> > > how
> > > > > to prune all the
> > > > > subtrees that do not contain any match with
> > > > > components of the WHERE
> > > > > clause in the XQuery result.
> > > > >
> > > > > The general pruning rule is "if an element
> does
> > > not
> > > > > participate in the
> > > > > satisfaction of the WHERE clause and all its
> > > > > children elements (if any)
> > > > > don't participate as well, then prune it
> from
> > > the
> > > > > result".
> > > > >
> > > > > A possible starting point is the following
> > > query,
> > > > > but the pruning action
> > > > > is missing.
> > > > >
> > > > > <Results>
> > > > > {
> > > > > for $A in doc("data.xml")/ASet/A
> > > > > where ($A/B = "red" or $A/B =
> "yellow")
> > > > > and ($A/C = "chair" or $A/C =
> > > "table")
> > > > > return ...
> > > > > }
> > > > > </Results>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sergio
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources
> > > site!
> > > > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Make Yahoo! your home page
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> >
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 09:07:08 UTC