I've submitted as http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1278 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk> To: "'Henry Luo'" <henryluo@vibrasoft.net>; "'Xavier Franc'" <xfranc@online.fr>; <www-ql@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:07 PM Subject: RE: Variable references in path expressions > > Personally I would strongly suggest either no atomic values > > to returned in > > path expression or atomic values to returned in any step of the path. > > The middle way is not a good choice. > > As I've mentioned before, if you want the WG to address this comment then > you need to raise it as a last call comment on the spec: see the status > section of the spec for instructions on how to do this. > > Michael Kay > > >Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 04:42:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:44 UTC