- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:50:57 -0400
- To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- CC: "'Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress'" <rden@loc.gov>, www-ql@w3.org
Michael Kay wrote: >>Needs to be de-institutionalized, then. It's not just a >>"strange" use, it's just plain wrong. > > Yes, but how do you get any organization to abandon its jargon? Start with the process document [1], which uses the word 'interoperable' throughout. As long as the process document uses the term that way, those of us who must comply with it are likely to use the term that way. Jonathan [1]http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:51:31 UTC