W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: interoperable implementations of XQuery

From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:50:57 -0400
Message-ID: <41757E31.1090601@datadirect.com>
To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
CC: "'Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress'" <rden@loc.gov>, www-ql@w3.org

Michael Kay wrote:
>>Needs to be de-institutionalized, then.   It's not just a 
>>"strange" use, it's just plain wrong.
> 
> Yes, but how do you get any organization to abandon its jargon?

Start with the process document [1], which uses the word 'interoperable' 
throughout.

As long as the process document uses the term that way, those of us who 
must comply with it are likely to use the term that way.

Jonathan

[1]http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:51:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:43 UTC