Michael Kay wrote: >>Needs to be de-institutionalized, then. It's not just a >>"strange" use, it's just plain wrong. > > Yes, but how do you get any organization to abandon its jargon? Start with the process document [1], which uses the word 'interoperable' throughout. As long as the process document uses the term that way, those of us who must comply with it are likely to use the term that way. Jonathan [1]http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.htmlReceived on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:51:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:43 UTC