- From: Jerome Simeon <simeon@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:09:30 -0400
- To: "Sievers, Jan" <j.sievers@sap.com>
- Cc: "www-Ql (www-ql@w3.org)" <www-ql@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFC23B3B9B.CD803954-ON85256EFB.006252A4-85256EFB.0063BC05@us.ibm.com>
Hi Jan, Yes, that is a bug. Good catch. The connection: ValueExpr -> PathExpr -> RelativePathExpr -> StepExpr -> FilterExpr -> PrimaryExpr was lost. It should be preserved in the XQuery core through: ValueExpr -> StepExpr -> PrimaryExpr There is no need for a FilterExpr which would just be a reference to PrimaryExpr, but we need to introduce back the StepExpr as being the union of AxisStep or PrimaryExpr. The corresponding grammar productions should be changed to the following: ValueExpr ::= ValidateExpr | StepExpr StepExpr ::= AxisStep | PrimaryExpr This will be fixed in the next version of the Formal Semantics document. Best, - Jerome "Sievers, Jan" <j.sievers@sap.com> Sent by: www-ql-request@w3.org 08/25/2004 11:36 AM To "www-Ql (www-ql@w3.org)" <www-ql@w3.org> cc Subject Missing productions in Core BNF (WD 20 February 2004)? Hi everybody, I am wondering if there are some productions missing in the Core BNF defined in "XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics" (Working Draft 20 February 2004). For instance there is no "StepExpr" or "FilterExpr" and the production [53 (Core)] "PrimaryExpr ::= ..." is never used. Is this a bug? Or is there something special about the normalization rules? Thanks, Jan Sievers
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2004 18:10:19 UTC