- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:16:18 -0700
- To: "Donald Spaeth" <donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk>, <www-ql@w3.org>
No problem. Michael's book had to be finalized slightly before the last call was published. So some of the last minute changes did not make it. I am sure he will update this in the next version. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Donald Spaeth [mailto:donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:13 PM > To: Michael Rys; www-ql@w3.org > Subject: Re: Ancestors and siblings > > Michael, > My source was Michael Brundage's new book on XQuery, pp. 68-69. However, > I > had not appreciated the finer points of the distinction between XQuery 1.0 > and XPath 2.0, and XQuery was my main concern. In any case, I am glad to > learn that they aren't as gone as I had feared. Thanks to Jan for the > pointer to full-axis feature. > > Cheers, > Don > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com> > To: "Donald Spaeth" <donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk>; <> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:19 PM > Subject: RE: Ancestors and siblings > > > XPath 2.0 still has them and for XQuery they have been added as optional > in the last call draft. Why do you think they are gone? > > Best regards > Michael >
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 16:23:53 UTC