- From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Cc: www-ql@w3.org
Thanks. I could see what you have mentioned in the spec. Is there a difference between XPath 1.0 and XPath 2.0? I guess XPath 1.0 never talked about returning a sequence, it mentions return a set of nodes, though "it was often assumed" by xml-dev folks that it returns a sequence..?? best, murali. On Fri, 21 May 2004, Michael Kay wrote: > > > I see that in XPath you mention that forward axes return a sequence of > > nodes in document order, and reverse axes return a sequence > > of nodes in reverse document order. > > Are we talking XPath 1.0 or 2.0? > > Either way, the statement isn't accurate. The result is always in document > order, regardless of the axis direction. But the binding of the current > position depends on the axis order. > > > > My question is regarding attribute and namespace axes; they > > are classified > > as forward axes; so what is the result order? > > They are forward axes, though of course it doesn't matter very much, because > the order of nodes on these axes is implementation-defined. > > Michael Kay
Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 15:56:01 UTC