- From: Jim Tivy <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:49:36 -0700
- To: "Jason Hunter" <jhunter@acm.org>, "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Howard Katz" <howardk@fatdog.com>, <www-ql@w3.org>
Folks I think we need use cases to discuss. What is your use case? Let me imagine a use case...: For a use case where you have two collections - "production" and "staged". I have an application which I want to run against either production or staged. The application has queries. I would want to have a variable called $input which I use in the queries and which I could set as part of the context to production or staged. Now if I have two collections in each environment - prodNews and stagedNews and prodWhitepaper and stagedWhitepaper, then I might want to have two variables $news and $whitepaper which I use in my application and which I set in the query context according to whether I am going against the production or staged collections. In this case having input() is not much use, but having variables is. Standardizing on default collections for the purpose of interoperability may not be a useful pursuit of a standard. Having a mechanism that allows a query to work off its context is probably a useful pursuit of a standard. cheers Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ql-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ql-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Jason Hunter > Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 11:20 AM > To: Michael Rys > Cc: Howard Katz; www-ql@w3.org > Subject: Re: top-level location-path context dependencies > > > > Michael Rys wrote: > > > In XQuery, the solution is very simple if you make it explicit: > > > > Bind a variable to the sequence. > > The other solution is to bring back input() from the May 2003 draft. > That's actually more elegant. > > -jh- > >
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2004 14:50:43 UTC