- From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders@ua.ac.be>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:03:57 +0200
- To: www-ql@w3.org
Bas de Bakker wrote: >>But now I'm still left with the following question. Is the >>semantics of >>the following expression well defined in the formal semantics? >> >> (<x><y id="1"/><y id="2"/></x>)/y > > I don't know about the formal semantics, Any information is welcome, although I really would like to know what the formal semantics exactly say. Why else do they exist? > but will refer you again to > section 3.2 of the data model: > > "The relative order of siblings is determined by their order in the XML > representation. A node N1 occurs before a node N2 in document order if > and only if the start of N1 occurs before the start of N2 in the XML > document." Since the fragment is constructed there is no original representation we can refer to. > And also: > > "Informally, document order is the order returned by an in-order, > depth-first, left-to-right traversal of the data model." Shouldn't that be a *pre*order traversal? Also this cannot tell us what the relative order of the children is if we don't know that order already. -- Jan Hidders .---------------------------------------------------------------------. | Post-doctoral researcher e-mail: jan.hidders@ua.ac.be | | Dept. Math. & Computer Science tel: (+32) 3 218 08 73 | | University of Antwerp fax: (+32) 3 218 07 77 | | Middelheimlaan 1, BE-2020 Antwerpen, BELGIUM room: G 3.21 | `---------------------------------------------------------------------'
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 07:03:29 UTC