- From: Michael Dyck <MichaelDyck@home.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:26:39 -0700
- To: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- CC: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk, www-ql@w3c.org, xmldb@xmldb.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Michael Rys wrote: > > the February's working drafts normative grammar was - umh - rather buggy What bugs did you find? Certainly, the BNF is ambiguous, but the subsequent precedence rules take care of most of that. Also, in the Use Case document, some of the 'Solutions in XQuery' appear to assume a different set of precedence rules, but it's not clear whether the Solutions or the grammar is at fault. -Michael Dyck
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 23:29:08 UTC