- From: <boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:53:41 -0400
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, www-qa@w3.org
fyi - there is also a review process for WCAG2.0 Test Samples Development Task Force [1] Best, Tim Boland NIST [1]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process Quoting "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>: > > > Karl, > > As a matter of practice, we now have (IMHO) a stable process. > > First, whenever someone raises test cases (or proposes > concrete ones, such as done by Ivan [1] or Fabien [2]) > the TF puts it on the agenda (see for example [3]). > > We then regularly do the review & approval in the TF > (note that there is a tool supporting this process > available at [4]). The decisions (approve/on hold/reject/) > on each TC are finally recorded at [5]. > > This is the process as practiced and it seems to work fine ;) > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Oct/0001.html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Sep/0069.html > [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes#item02 > [4] http://sw.joanneum.at/rdfa/rdfadebug/index.php > [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Michael Hausenblas, MSc. > Institute of Information Systems & Information Management > JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH > > http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] > >Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:07 AM > >To: Hausenblas, Michael > >Cc: Dan Connolly; Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task force; www-qa@w3.org > >Subject: Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in > >(approved) test 0009 > > > >Hi Michael > > > >Hausenblas, Michael (7 août 2007 - 15:10) : > >> However, what is missing IMHO are clear instructions how > >> to actually do the test *review*. > > > >Did you made progress on this, or did you decide of a Process? > > > >-- > >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ > >W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead > > QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ > > *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 13:55:36 UTC