Re: QA and current state of XML schemas for XHTML?

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Working Group (WG)
  has an issues database of changes submitted against the 27 April 2006
WCAG2.0 Last Call Working Draft (WD) (the WG is resolving/responding to 
these issues, so the
database is being updated frequently), but this database is not linked from 
this WD.
I can ask the co-chairs of the WCAG WG if such a link could be added to 
future versions
of the specification..

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

At 08:02 AM 3/2/2007 +0000, Alexandre Alapetite wrote:



>Hi Karl and Olivier,
>
>2007/3/2, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>:
>>1. The QA matrix [1] For each WD, link to the issues list
>>2. Issues in context for a WD in TR/
>>3. List of issues in a section for a WD in TR/
>>4. Links in context to the relevant issues in a list outside of the WD
>>5. Link to the issues list in the status section of the WD.
>>
>>Alexandre, which one(s), do you prefer? more usable from a developer
>>point of view.
>>
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix
>
>As you say, I have often been told that updating documents in TR/ was
>not easy. Therefore, it would probably be better to have a link to a
>list outside of the WD that can be updated independently of the WD.
>That is your proposition 5. The QA Matrix (1) can of course have the
>same link.
>
>In this external list of issues, you may consider enhancing the system
>to make it possible to share some issues or at least easily navigate
>between flavours of the same technology (e.g. XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1,
>etc.). Within one family (e.g. XHTML), it could be possible to select
>one or more precise versions for which the issue applies. This is the
>case in some Bugzilla tracking (e.g. PHP / PHP5.x / PHP 5.2).
>
>Finally, it would be helpful to ensure some consistency across
>recommendations in this regard.
>
>Cordially,
>Alexandre
>http://alexandre.alapetite.fr
>

Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 15:04:55 UTC