- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:41:53 +0000
- To: www-qa@w3.org, public-evangelist@w3.org
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:33:58AM -0000, Patrick Lauke wrote: > So disregard my statement about "wrong" (although, turning the > above argument around, calling an image a "shortcut" seems a bit > of a stretch - to be pedantic, wouldn't the icon be a visual > representation associated with a shortcut, and not a shortcut > in its own right? Oh yes, this is the typical kind of bad naming choice that tends to happen when indivdual vendors just go ahead and implement something because it seems like a good idea rather then getting the design peer reviewed first. Google and rel="nofollow" is another example (not only does it not describe a relationship at all, but it means "DO Follow, but don't consider this link to be an endorsement of the resource"). -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 09:42:00 UTC