- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:54:39 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>
Hi, (Patrick Curran, a question for you) there's a discussion on OASIS mailing list about Conformance Testing for OpenDocument format. I wonder if someone from the list is participating to this mailing-list and maybe could recommend part of the materials we have produced in the QA WG. They seem to have questions, we are addressing in our documents. I see in the list of attendees of their last meeting. (edited to remove email addresses and spam, see the original message for email.) [[[ Attendees --------- Michael Brauer (chair) , Sun Microsystems Patrick Durusau Gary Edwards David Faure Yue Ma, IBM Tom Magliery, Blast Readius Lars Oppermann, Sun Microsystems Florian Reuter, Sun Microsystems ]]] - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200510/msg00009.html There are a few people from Sun, Maybe Patrick could contact these people. * June 2005 [[[ General Discussion ------------------ Discussion on database format proposal will continue. Conformance and conformance testing is something many people seem to be asking for. (Maybe even a test-suite). Florian will post some examples for conformance rules that can be used as a base for further discussion. On the topic of formula language standardization, Nathaniel is trying to find people at IBM who might take up the work which has been started by David Wheeler on a docuemntation for an interoperable formula language for spreadsheet applications New Action Items ---------------- Florian: post some examples for conformance testing ]]] - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200506/msg00020.html * June 2005 [[[ On conformance, Florian outlined a possible model as a starting point for discussuin. Conformance would therein be gauged by a list, that expresses, for every feature of OpenDocuemnt, whether an application is implementing it on a "content only", "structural" or "style" level, where each level implies the previous. Problems that were seen during the discussion were, that such a list would be very lengthy and of limited use to the casual user selecting an application. Furthermore, it cannot be said, how exactly each feature is to be rendered in every situation, so visual or "style" conformance would be hard to judge. Lasr suggested, that XSL-FO might be used to describe the rendering of each feature, the usefullness and maintainability of such an effort however remains questionable. A general issue that was derived from the discussion, is the question on how layout and visual presentaion are relevant for the work of the TC (and whether they are at all). ]]] - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200506/msg00023.html -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 15:54:50 UTC