Re: answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing

On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:52:05 PM, Karl wrote:

KD> Dear Chris,

KD> Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
KD> Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

KD> After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will
KD> be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

KD> Original comment (issue 1148 [1]):
KD> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0012.html

KD> As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your
KD> comment and has decided to drop the specific example which was indeed
KD> not clear without more context.

KD> [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
KD> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
KD> [2]
KD> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#ref-define-ex


OK, thanks.


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:49:13 UTC